MAXTOR ATLAS 10K DRIVER
Non-localized access and high queue depths differentiate server-style disk access from even the most demanding of workstation loads. Next on the scene was Fujitsu’s MAP Subjectively, however, the Ultrastar is considerably more obtrusive than the 10K V and the Cheetah 10K. The Atlas 10K V weighs in at Unlike Seagate and Fujitsu, Maxtor sticks with a traditional ball bearing motor rather than the fluid dynamic bearing motors found on the Cheetah and MAP.
|Date Added:||21 October 2016|
|File Size:||63.89 Mb|
|Operating Systems:||Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
With the 10K V, the firm has moved the Atlas to fluid dynamic bearing motors and has introduced a host of secondary improvements intended to maintain or increase performance. Games, of course, are not multitasked- all five titles were atlae in a serial fashion featuring approximately half an hour of play time per game.
Finally, Maxtor would deliver a drive that excelled in desktop performance while trailing Fujitsu’s disk in multi-user performance.
Lord of Destruction v1. Though most ATA drives still register significantly quieter than the Atlas, it nonetheless follows the laudable trend of reduced noise. Service Time Graphs in milliseconds. Let’s hope this prediction pans out! Despite their age, the Disk WinMarks are somewhat of an industry standard.
A proprietary analysis engine then processes the qualified dataset.
We’ve been told to expect shipment into the channel before the close of the year. The Atlas 10K V weighs in at Legacy Performance eTesting Lab’s WinBench 99 Disk WinMark tests are benchmarks that attempt to measure desktop performance through a rather dated recording of 10, applications. Seek noises are clearly audible, as one would expect from a SCSI drive that features blazing seek times.
The High-End DriveMark includes significantly more sequential transfers and write as opposed to read operations. Legacy Performance Graphs in megabytes per second.
Maxtor Atlas 10K III Internal Hard Drive (GB, Ultra SCSI Pin) Overview – CNET
Lord of Destruction v1. Bear in mind that improved bandwidth is only one of the benefits that Ultra delivers. The figure typically represents the highest sustained transfer rate a drive delivers.
The figures provided are net temperatures representing the difference between the mwxtor drive temperature and ambient temperature. Windows XP’s boot procedure involves significantly different access patterns and queue depths than those found in other disk accesses.
AAF purportedly improves signal strength and integrity over traditional pre-compensation methods to further increase atla, decrease data error rates, and improve device compatibility and interoperability.
Subtracting 3 milliseconds to account for rotational latency yields an average measured seek time of 4. Tintri releases TGC 4. Seagate was always maxttor in delivering next-generation product. In the end, when installed in our testbed chassis, the Atlas at idle remains relatively quiet despite its high measurement.
Maxtor Atlas 10K V
In the following tests, the GB Maxtor Atlas 10K V is compared against the following drives for the following reasons: Maxtor, Fujitsu, and Seagate eventually followed with their launches.
Next on the scene was Fujitsu’s MAP Single-User Performance StorageReview uses the following tests to assess non-server use: SR presents results to readers through a percentile ranking system. This test recreates Windows XP’s bootup from the initial bootstrap load all the way to initialization and loading of the following memory-resident utilities: In such a setup, any performance advantages that Ultra along with the requisite higher-bandwidth bit PCI slots would deliver over are negligible.
Legacy Performance eTesting Lab’s Maxror 99 Disk WinMark tests are benchmarks that attempt to measure desktop performance through a rather dated recording of high-level applications.
While the single-platter 8Dx0 model scores a 4. Applications include Adobe Photoshop v5.